PAGES:

HomeAnthromes | Land use

The remotest place on Earth

29. January 2010 by Erle 2 Comments

tibet_from_visualePeople are everywhere these days, but if you really want to “get away from it all” , the remotest place on Earth, aside from Antarctica, turns out to be Tibet.  This from a New Scientist article (and related blog post) that explores travel times in the global accessibility map we discussed in a blog post last year.  The “remotest point on Earth”, 34.7°N, 85.7°E, apparently takes a day by car and 20 days on foot from Lhasa.  Or maybe you’d rather visit the “wildest” place on Earth- there are maps that can help you get there as well.

For now, I’ll stick with getting back to nature here in my urban anthrome, and save a bit of carbon.

Comments

William@philosophy degree
United States William@philosophy degree said:

A similar accessibility map was discussed on Slashdot (or boingboing) 2-3 years ago. Guess the place hasn't changed much. Some places in Africa look pretty inaccessible too. I assumed most of Africa (including Sahara region) would be inhabited.

Looking at the 'human footprint index' map, it was surprising to see so much green in China, but then I realized this was the tibetian part I was looking at Wink

Garrett Bender
United States Garrett Bender said:

Who would have thought that the remotest place was in tibet. Antartica was an easy one. I think I will stick to my local park.

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading